Particularly, Terrett claimed that Hinman met with ConsenSys officers.
So what? Was that alleged to show he believes ETH is a safety or that he deliberate to make it a safety? Wow. XD
These founders, particularly Vitalik Buterin, have made statements that others interpret as troublesome.
Akin to?
Then again, Bitcoin stays censorship-resistant.
No, it isn’t. It is a PoW chain, in any case.
Particularly, it has resisted many calls up to now to change its code.
That is not what censorship-resistant means in any respect.
It additionally doesn’t have an individual equal to Buterin.
Fully irrelevant to censorship-resistance as nicely. For censorship-resistant proponents, understanding what it means could possibly be thought of some commonplace expectation. Properly, nope, it would not appear so. XD
In truth, those that could have match the invoice at the moment are in Bitcoin Money (Roger Ver) and Bitcoin SV (Craig Wright).
They usually have very elegantly confirmed BTC insurance policies may be modified by way of their forks. The actual fact BTC devs refuse to take action is not a safety measure in any method: it is only a alternative, not an impossibility.
